- Our current IT person says we're 'fine' because we have MFA. Are we?
- MFA is one control of the Essential Eight's eight, and only effective if it's phish-resistant, if it's applied to every critical system (not just Microsoft 365), and if it's enforced rather than suggested. Most firms we assess have MFA on email and nothing else, and SMS-based codes on top of that. That's not "fine." We can assess your current maturity and give you a plain-English answer.
- Can you run our practice-management software (Affinity, LEAP, Smokeball, etc.)?
- We manage the environment those applications run on: the Microsoft 365 tenant, the devices, the network, the backups, the identities. Where the vendor provides a cloud-hosted version, we integrate it into your security and identity stack. Where it's still on-premises, we host or manage the server hosting it. Application-level workflow support remains with the software vendor, but we know where the boundary sits and we own the systems side end-to-end.
- Our clients are starting to send us security questionnaires. Can you help?
- Yes. We've completed these for firms being asked by corporate clients, major financial institutions, and listed companies. We fill them in with you, not for you, because some answers are yours to give (incident-response decisions, retention policy) and some are ours (technical control detail). Either way, we'd rather give an honest "partial" than a confident "yes" that blows up on audit.
- We had a suspicious email go to a partner. What do we do?
- Right now: don't click anything, don't delete the email, and ring us. We have an incident-response playbook that starts with containment, works through identity and endpoint verification, and ends with a written record you can show your insurer if needed. If it turns out to be nothing, the record matters less. If it's real, the first hour is where most of the damage is prevented.
- Can our lawyers use Microsoft 365 Copilot or Claude for Work on matter data?
- Yes, with governance. Copilot inherits every access permission a user already has, which in most law firms includes matters they shouldn't reach and client data they shouldn't summarise. Before rolling out Copilot we audit matter-level permissions, apply sensitivity labels, and pilot with a small practice group. For Claude for Work or ChatGPT Enterprise, the considerations are similar: enterprise tier with the right data-processing terms, acceptable-use policy written for legal context, consumer tiers blocked at DNS. None of it is a blanket yes or no. All of it is a tooling-plus-policy question we've helped firms work through.
- AML/CTF Tranche 2 is coming in July 2026. How much of this is an IT problem?
- Most of it, underneath the legal work. You need a written AML/CTF program, KYC record-keeping, audit trails, staff training records, and a way to produce the evidence when AUSTRAC asks. We don't write the AML/CTF program itself (that's your legal and compliance call), but we set up the document-management, identity, logging and retention infrastructure that makes the program actually operable. The firms leaving this to the last month before 29 July 2026 will struggle; the ones starting in early 2026 will be fine.